<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Odds are odd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.osirra.com/2006/01/28/odds-are-odd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.osirra.com/2006/01/28/odds-are-odd/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 21:06:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://blog.osirra.com/2006/01/28/odds-are-odd/comment-page-1/#comment-944</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 04:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.osirra.com/?p=418#comment-944</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Not this still.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I originally came across this problem some time back (like years)... it&#039;s very old.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the time, of course it was debated and I recalled that the answer was the opposite of what one would initially imagine, and also that it was best explained by extrapolating to many more doors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OK, in my defence when I read the original post I went looking for something to explain and found that page (not being bothered to type much).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cunningly, I should have read it, because the idea that odds are unchanged in original problem, as argued in the reporter&#039;s article rely on the assumption that MONTY DOESN&#039;T KNOW WHERE THE CAR IS!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, that clearly isn&#039;t the case (or Monty is incredibly lucky) and hence odds are skewed as a result.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;P.S. Dan, that&#039;s as close to an admission you are correct as you&#039;ll get. Of course you cannot take credit for any of it anyhow because this problem is as old as the hills and has been pondered many times on the &#039;net! ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not this still.</p>
<p>I originally came across this problem some time back (like years)&#8230; it&#8217;s very old.</p>
<p>At the time, of course it was debated and I recalled that the answer was the opposite of what one would initially imagine, and also that it was best explained by extrapolating to many more doors.</p>
<p>OK, in my defence when I read the original post I went looking for something to explain and found that page (not being bothered to type much).</p>
<p>Cunningly, I should have read it, because the idea that odds are unchanged in original problem, as argued in the reporter&#8217;s article rely on the assumption that MONTY DOESN&#8217;T KNOW WHERE THE CAR IS!</p>
<p>However, that clearly isn&#8217;t the case (or Monty is incredibly lucky) and hence odds are skewed as a result.</p>
<p>P.S. Dan, that&#8217;s as close to an admission you are correct as you&#8217;ll get. Of course you cannot take credit for any of it anyhow because this problem is as old as the hills and has been pondered many times on the &#8216;net! <img src='http://blog.osirra.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
