More pi?
Some more information about the Oregon pi anomaly. In no way conclusive about what or why. But a bit of information nonetheless.
June 1, 2007 | Filed Under Numbers and stuff
Comments
2 Responses to “More pi?”
Leave a Reply
-
Recently Written
- We are ill-equipped to vote on our membership of the EU
- Famous British people aged 69
- My take on the election, and what lies ahead
- The 2015 Budget: In household terms
- Pi Day 2015
- The scope of frameworks
- G-Cloud: Is there a silver, padded lining?
- Why I’m phoning myself – for 33 hours
- Freedom of speech: What do you mean?
- Nats should be applauded
-
Categories
-
Archives
- June 2016
- January 2016
- May 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
-
Admin
Thanks Dan – seems pretty conclusive to me – the artist just read the down the columns first, rather than across the rows – I put my money on it being an error – it’s in a tunnel, so having pi would make sense, rather than some weird alternative – there’s also a bunch of other stuff which is educational on the walls.
More evidence that art cannot be trusted – watched an interesting film documentary last night called Who the #$%! is Jackson Pollock?, about a female truck driver that may have bought an original Jackson Pollock for $5 at a thrift store and her attempts to get it authenticated.
Not convinced, Jon. While (s)he used all the digits in that left-hand column, they weren’t in the right order. There was some transposition going on.