<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter: what to do with a follower</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.osirra.com/2010/01/01/twitter-what-to-do-with-a-follower/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.osirra.com/2010/01/01/twitter-what-to-do-with-a-follower/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:35:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Robinson</title>
		<link>http://blog.osirra.com/2010/01/01/twitter-what-to-do-with-a-follower/comment-page-1/#comment-4340</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.osirra.com/?p=3339#comment-4340</guid>
		<description>Yep, I think that&#039;s pretty much the algorithm I use.

When it comes to number of followers they have and number of people they follow, I seem to have two criteria I&#039;m operating:

1) I rarely follow back any &#039;broadcast&#039; tweeters - i.e. people who have significantly more followers than people they follow by a factor of several hundred. They&#039;re either celebs (and should therefore be shot anyway) or it&#039;d be better to buy their book and read the version with punctuation. Alain deBotton http://twitter.com/AlaindeBotton is one of my rare exceptions - his infrequent tweets are beautifully crafted;

2) I rarely follow back anyone who follows more than several hundred other people, as I don&#039;t really believe that they are going to read my tweets.

Not sure how the part of the algorithm about content would work though. There&#039;s a risk that twitter would be likely to come up with something where popularity is used as a proxy for good content!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, I think that&#8217;s pretty much the algorithm I use.</p>
<p>When it comes to number of followers they have and number of people they follow, I seem to have two criteria I&#8217;m operating:</p>
<p>1) I rarely follow back any &#8216;broadcast&#8217; tweeters &#8211; i.e. people who have significantly more followers than people they follow by a factor of several hundred. They&#8217;re either celebs (and should therefore be shot anyway) or it&#8217;d be better to buy their book and read the version with punctuation. Alain deBotton <a target="_blank" href="http://twitter.com/AlaindeBotton"  rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/AlaindeBotton</a> is one of my rare exceptions &#8211; his infrequent tweets are beautifully crafted;</p>
<p>2) I rarely follow back anyone who follows more than several hundred other people, as I don&#8217;t really believe that they are going to read my tweets.</p>
<p>Not sure how the part of the algorithm about content would work though. There&#8217;s a risk that twitter would be likely to come up with something where popularity is used as a proxy for good content!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
